Sunday, February 5, 2012

Tax The Rich?


 Haven't had much time or energy for writing this week, but I was having some thoughts about taxes and such that seem to go against the grain of many people that I know. A lot of people think that raising taxes for the “rich” will solve so many of life's troubles that it needs to be done immediately, if not retroactively. Even a few of the more affluent out there are making a noise about being willing to pay higher taxes and I think that's great. But why are they waiting?

You see, the idea is that we should force people to pay more in taxes so that the government will have more cash to help those who are less fortunate. The money could then be used to create more jobs, feed the hungry and build more houses. Sounds awesome, doesn't it? But what's the point?

If someone truly wants to help the less fortunate of the world there is no reason for them to wait until the government makes that assistance mandatory. They can simply write a check and take it to the nearest food pantry or shelter so that the funds are used immediately and locally. That way, the donor gets the benefit of seeing and knowing exactly who is being helped by their generosity. No bureaucracy to wait for, no committees to wade through, and no question of where the funds are going. The money goes from the hand of who has it to the hand of who needs it. Simple as that.

If, on the other hand, we take the money from those who have it in the form of a tax, the compulsory nature of the tax makes the giving less meaningful. In fact, it's not giving anymore...it's a tax; and those are two totally different things. A tax means that the government has a better idea how to use your money than you do, and that is completely untrue in most cases. Giving means that you see a need and are willing to meet that need with whatever you have available to you. Giving is willing, taxing is forced. Isn't it interesting that a person would say that they are willing to be forced to do the right thing while being unable to make themselves just do it? I think that our country would have a stronger sense of unity if we would all just do the right thing in the area of philanthropy instead of waiting for someone in Washington to make us do it. A helping hand from a neighbor is usually perceived as less threatening than a government hand-out, and it is easier to monitor for abuse. If I loan my friend some money to make his mortgage payment and he spends it on beer; guess what happens? No more loans! Accountability is better with local philanthropy and the money is used more efficiently. So, why would we rely on taxes? Really, does anybody want to pay more taxes? I don't think so.

Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but I don't think the celebrities who wave the “I'll pay more taxes” banner are very sincere. If they want to do something good with their money they will. If not, then higher taxes will just give them something to complain about while the money gets lost in the system.

So, what do we do? Lower taxes for everyone so that each of us can determine how to use our own resources. Stop turning our heads as we pass the homeless on the streets. Start visiting the shelters. Listen to others and live as a community so that needs are met as they come up. Stop waiting for “Big Brother” to tell us where to help and just do it. The we will be choosing to do what's right instead of waiting to be forced to.